Search for: "Marker v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 559
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2016, 2:29 pm by Georgialee Lang
 Human sexuality is an objective biological binary trait: “XY” and “XX” are genetic markers of health – not genetic markers of a disorder. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:27 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It is clear that this is a matter in which states would be afforded a high degree of latitude by the European Court, having regard to the absence of any consensus amongst the states which are parties to the Convention, the complexity and sensitivity of the issue, and the need for a balance to be struck between competing private and public interests. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 2:19 am by Alfred Brophy
 Lombardo is the author of the very important book on Buck v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 4:55 pm
Grimsley of Grimsley Marker & Iseley, P.A., in Jacksonville, Florida, was on the winning side of Taylor v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:00 am by Samantha Knights, Matrix
Of interest to constitutional lawyers, the Court embarked upon a detailed consideration of an earlier decision in Quark Fishing Ltd v UK, App. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 1:20 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
The Erie County Court of Common Pleas recently issued an interesting January 25, 2012 Memorandum Opinion in the case of Joyce v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  As of the time of trial, the state of the art did not include a genetic marker for SJS/TEN. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 12:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. [read post]