Search for: "Markes v. United States"
Results 241 - 260
of 10,262
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2009, 10:09 am
Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 8:20 am
Olson, 487 U.S. 654 (1988), because a False Marking qui tam relator is not an inferior officer of the government, but rather, is an assignee of a revocable interest of the United States. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 12:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:03 am
For comprehensive discussion of the First Bank of the United States, a leading authority is Mark R. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 4:43 am
Supreme Court, United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 3:43 am
It noted that in Belmora, Bayer acknowledged that it did not use the mark FLANAX in the United States; here Coca-Cola proved that is products are sold by third-party importers in the United States. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:37 pm
” So why, pray tell, are the ACLU and CCR suing Panetta, Petraeus, McRaven, and Votel — but not the president of the United States? [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:53 pm
The United States Supreme Court has already announced that it will review three state tax cases in its upcoming term — Comptroller v. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 11:57 am
Marks on Behalf of SM v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 11:03 am
[etc.] or packaging of any type or nature;(ii) that is identical with, or substantially indistinguishable from, a mark registered on the principal register in the United States Patent and Trademark Office and in use, whether or not the defendant knew such mark was so registered;(iii) that is applied to or used in connection with the goods or services for which the mark is registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office... [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
It allows anybody (without regard to personal injury) to bring a lawsuit and retain half of the collected penalty with the other half going to the United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 2:04 pm
Basic information about a patent, such as the filing, issue and priority dates associated with a particular U.S. patent number are available at, for example, the website of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 1:51 pm
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
There again, the peculiarly interesting state of trade mark law in the United Kingdom and, not far beyond it, in the territory of the European Economic Area, might be closer to the cause. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 12:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:37 am
Lumpkin On May 31, 2016, the US Supreme Court ruled in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 2:52 am
’ United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
State, 701 So.2d 76 (Fla. 1997) and Buenoano v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:35 pm
The courts in the United States do not recognize the "well-known mark" basis for relief (but see Grupo Gigante v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 8:46 am
United Kingdom From the recent British case in Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft v Technosport London Limited it appears that the vigorous enforcement of BMW trade mark rights is a trend that can also be found in other countries. [read post]
