Search for: "Markes v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 10,253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Post’s new book, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921-1930, is the latest installment of the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Things can be source identifiers, without being commercial source identifiers (United We Stand): confusion but not dilution actionable Jack Daniel’s didn’t purport to decide the full scope of the “noncommercial” exclusion. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
”[29]The Court in this case used a methodology that was a marked departure from the approach it has had used in previous cases brought under the Genocide Convention. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
Finally, Title 10 status occurs when state National Guard units are “federalized” by the president of the United States pursuant to one of the statutory authorities for doing so. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
United States, on the President’s removal power, which was “severely undercut[]” by a unanimous Court less than a decade later in Humphrey’s Executor (p. 416). [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
”) Florence Kelley didn’t think you had to squint to notice the enduringly unequal status of women in the United States in 1923. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
We view recent posts by Mark Graber and others in a similar fashion. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Rev. 2135 (2023).ICYMI: "Of Course Presidents Are Officers of the United States," says Mark Graber (The Atlantic). [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
Here at least the labor specialization of states has produced something quite interesting. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Since then, subsequent additions to the official History of the Supreme Court of the United States have been famously unpunctual, uneven, and mostly unheralded. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
See, e.g., Lochner v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 11:41 pm
” That case, now styled Murthy v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:08 pm
AUSTRAC also co-hosted a Pacific Financial Intelligence Community meeting and provided the Cook Islands Financial Intelligence Unit with a new TAIPAN data analytics system. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:48 am
Court of Appeals in Thaler v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:33 pm
In 1948, Murray published their first book, States’ Laws on Race and Color, a 700-hundred-page analysis and critique of segregation in the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
