Search for: "Market Ins. Corp. v. Integrity Ins. Co. (1987)" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[32] The parties’ intentions are considered a matter of law, and intent is referred to the trier of fact only if a court determines that the document is ambiguous as a matter of law.[33] Under the objective standard, statements of the parties’ intentions carry the greatest weight.[34] In Teachers Ins. and Annuity Ass’n of America v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court articulated the modern extraterritoriality test in two alcohol price-affirmation cases in the 1980s.[14] Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm by Wolfgang Demino
She claims that while the Defendants and other lenders informed borrowers such as herself that their loans were nondischargeable, these lenders securitized these same obligations for sale on the secondary market. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
  The first was statutory law—we considered the culture of statutory law making in the United States as more inclined toward statutory complication rather than to integrated legal code development. [read post]