Search for: "Market-Front Co. v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 40 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
When a plaintiff “wins” a court decision, that really means the plaintiff gets a chance to prove their case in front of a jury. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
Best, the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, held that a third party, who had knowledge that the motorist they were texting was driving at a time the parties were exchanging text messages, could be found liable for any resulting damages. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  [Courts] recognized a core principle of social responsibility that justified what was then a new form of liability:  The purpose of this [product] liability is to ensure that the costs of injuries resulting from defective products are borne by the manufacturers that put such products on the market. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:42 am by Ann Carlson
What is especially interesting about the court case, Associated Irritated Residents v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The Swedish Patent and Market Court of Appeal has ordered The Pirate Bay and Swefilmer to be blocked. [read post]
10 May 2020, 7:48 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Ontario Court of Appeal also reviewed these provisions in R. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 9:52 am by Robert Guite and Sascha Henry
”[ix] General, vague statements about a product’s superiority, rather than a misdescription of a specific or absolute characteristic of the product, may lead to dismissal of the claim if the court finds it implausible th [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 9:52 am by Robert Guite and Sascha Henry
”[ix] General, vague statements about a product’s superiority, rather than a misdescription of a specific or absolute characteristic of the product, may lead to dismissal of the claim if the court finds it implausible th [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:18 pm by Lauren
Superior Court (Plotkin) 194 Cal.App.4th 210 Two and a half months after the Third District filed its decision in the Cobb matter, the appellate courts’ Second District published its own opinion on inverse condemnation on April 12, 2011. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:45 pm
Co. of Pittsburgh, PA v. [read post]
LITIGATION Two More Vanilla Cases Get Thrown Out of the Food Court In Robie v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm by Timothy Zick
, Kavanaugh joined an opinion holding that a police reserve officer’s emails to his superiors, in which he cc’d his co-workers, were not protected under the balancing test adopted by the Supreme Court in Pickering v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 10:04 am by Law Lady
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District.Criminal law -- Evidence -- Hearsay -- Tape recording -- Trial court did not err in allowing surreptitiously recorded conversation between defendant and co-defendant in the back of a patrol car to be played at trial where defendant's side of conversation was admissible as a party admission and co-defendant's side of conversation was admissible to place defendant's statements into context -- Further, conversation… [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
 The  Supreme Court of Canada finally upped Robinson’s total award from the $2.7 million figure set by the Quebec Court of Appeal, but without restoring it fully to the $5.2 million awarded by Superior Court Judge Claude Auclair in 2009. [read post]