Search for: "Marketing Displays International v. Shaw" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Unlike the German right, the right cannot be waived and requires those who wish to display non-insignificant excerpts to pay a licence fee. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
Shell Oil Company, et al., No. 16-713 BPCIA – Notice of Commercial Marketing: Apotex Inc., et al. v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
: (Innovationpartners), ICANN reforms threaten voice of IP owners: (Managing Intellectual Property), INTA 130th annual meeting – a report: (IPKat), (Intellectual Property Watch), (IAM), INTA’s online Committee Portal premiers: (Managing Intellectual Property), Hans Van Bylen tells how careful brand management and exploitation of ‘glocal’ products helped Henkel become global player: (Managing Intellectual Property), Records number of IP owners applied for… [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06  OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]