Search for: "Markin v. Markin"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Markin v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:45 am
District Court Judge Stephen V. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 7:04 am
Markin and U.S. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:10 pm
Khabarova, & Natalia V. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 10:11 am
Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 4:27 am
The spending power also enters the picture: US v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 2:29 am
Despite being conceptually dissimilar, the degree of similarity was held to be average, not ‘at most very low’, as the Board of Appeal considered in the contested decision.Bee-Fee Group MarkIn relation to the repute of the earlier mark, the contested decision found that the evidence showed use of the word mark LOUIS VUITTON and the Monogram canvas essentially for leather goods, bags in particular, and that, the applicant had produced no convincing evidence as regards the… [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:24 am
, Inc v Jen, Chi [2019] SGIPOS 3. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 1:32 pm
As the General Court had established in T-111/16, Prada v EUIPO, a well-known trade mark (as 'PRADA' and 'BOSS' are) enjoys extended protection, but no protection is available when the latter’s sign fails to establish a link with it (as it was for 'THE RICH PRADA' and hotel services in that case, and 'BOSS SHOT' and the goods mentioned above here). [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 2:18 pm
The Court has also considered that as the advancement of gender equality is today a major goal in the member States of the Council of Europe, very weighty reasons would have to be put forward before such a difference of treatment could be regarded as compatible with the Convention (Konstantin Markin v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:31 pm
Case T‑521/13 Alpinestars Research Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Kean Tung Cho and Ling-Yuan Wang Yu, a General Court of the European Union (Third Chamber) decision going back to 7 July, is one of those decisions that has been sitting in this Kat's in-tray for far too long. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 3:07 am
opposing markOpposed markIn L’Oreal v Interconsumer Products Limited(unreported), the High Court of Kenya in a ruling delivered on 21stFebruary 2012, dismissed an appeal filed by L’oreal against the decision of the Registrar of Trademarks rejecting L’Oreal’s opposition to the registration of the mark NICE & LOVELY HERBAL OIL MOISTURIZER (opposed mark). [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 2:48 pm
Markin, 1:22-cv-06276 (S.D.N.Y. 2022) [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 6:48 pm
Reg. 82/20 of the Act in Hudson’s Bay Company ULC v. [read post]
