Search for: "Marks v. Goodding"
Results 181 - 200
of 12,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2021, 3:49 am
Nfinity IP, LLC v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 12:51 pm
SEC Dimissed Lawsuit Against Mark Cuban [The Cuban Revolution] Mark Cuban Wins a Big Round Against SEC Insider Trading Rap [Professor Bainbridge] SEC's Insider Trading Suit Against Mark Cuban Is Dismissed [WSJ Law Blog] SEC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 6:55 pm
My good friend and law school classmate Mark Rienzi (of Catholic Univ. [read post]
12 May 2011, 2:19 am
Symbion Pharmacy Services Pty Ltd v Idameneo (No 789) Limited [2011] FCA 389 [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
Let’s start with the legislation – a very good place to start The Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) (the Act) makes it clear under section 27(1) that an application for registration of a trade mark may be made if the person claims to be the owner of the trade mark. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
Let’s start with the legislation – a very good place to start The Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) (the Act) makes it clear under section 27(1) that an application for registration of a trade mark may be made if the person claims to be the owner of the trade mark. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 7:12 am
Now, in Iancu v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:47 am
but also the creator of the content that the physical item conveys" (Dastar Corp v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp, 539 US 23, at 33). [read post]
1 May 2020, 4:24 am
When considering the global appreciation of the marks from the perspective of the average consumer, including its similarities and its differences, it was highlighted that it was also necessary to take into account the context of use to the extent permitted by the law (as set out in Specsavers v Asda). [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 4:13 pm
Although there are goods and services where the mark, on its own, or with other matter, may be regarded as being distinctive, a cautious approach is required. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 12:41 am
(6) When making its assessment of the distinctive character of a trade mark, the tribunal may take the following into account: (i) the market share held by the mark; (ii) how intensive, geographically widespread and long-standing use of the mark has been; (iii) the amount invested by the undertaking in promoting the mark; (iv) the proportion of the relevant class of persons who, because of the mark, identify… [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 2:38 pm
KGAA v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 1:26 am
In Coca-Cola Co v All-Fect Distributors Ltd [1999] FCA 1721, [19], the Full Bench of the Federal Court held: Use ‘as a trade mark’ is use of the mark as a ‘badge of origin’ in the sense that it indicates a connection in the course of trade between goods and the person who applies the mark to the goods ... [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 2:17 am
The Board found the marks confusingly similar, but what about the goods? [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 1:11 am
Coach Services, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 4:36 am
Advance Magazine Publishers Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 2:24 am
Omega SA (Omega AG) (Omega LTD.) v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 9:30 am
Urban Dollz LLC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 2:31 am
Retail Royalty Company v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 8:46 pm
Chocolaterie Guylian N.V. v Registrar of Trade Marks [2009] FCA 891 '); //--> [read post]
