Search for: "Marks v. Goodding"
Results 61 - 80
of 12,085
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2024, 12:49 pm
The case (Extreme Durable, I ZR 205/22) focuses on whether the possession of goods abroad constitutes trade mark infringement if the goods are held for the purpose of offering them in the country where the trade mark is protected - in this case, goods stored in Spain and offered for sale on www.amazon.de, which targets German consumers. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
”[2] Wells may have been entitled to his opinion about the quality of the study at issue, and if he had good grounds and a reliable methodology, perhaps he should have been permitted to share that opinion with a jury. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:16 am
Author Mcwesty Licence Public Domain Source Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertSupreme Court (Lords Hodge, Briggs, Hamblen, Burrows and Kitchin) Lifestyle Equities CV and another v Amazon UK Services Ltd and others [2024] UKSC 8 (6 Mar 2024)The Beverly Hills Polo Club is a popular range of clothing and luxury goods on both sides of the Atlantic. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
This year marks our 10th annual accounting of ridiculous redactions, outrageous copying fees, and retaliatory attacks on requesters—and we have some doozies for the ages. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:31 am
The Advancetrack decision E-Accounting Solutions Ltd (t/a Advancetrack) v Global Infosys Ltd (t/a GI Outsourcing) was a 2023 High Court trade mark infringement dispute (concerning adwords). [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:03 am
Hannah V. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
Bakshi v Hosseinzadeh (2017 ONCA 838) marks the seminal case which questions whether property transferred as Mahr, should be excluded pursuant to section 4(2) of the FLA or whether it should be included in the parties’ Net Family Property (NFP) for purposes of the equalization calculation. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
Bakshi v Hosseinzadeh (2017 ONCA 838) marks the seminal case which questions whether property transferred as Mahr, should be excluded pursuant to section 4(2) of the FLA or whether it should be included in the parties’ Net Family Property (NFP) for purposes of the equalization calculation. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
The Tribunal held that there was both trade mark and copyright infringement.Anna Maria Stein outlined the findings of the UKIPO's report on “The impact of complicit social media influencers on male’s consumption of counterfeit goods in the UK. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:04 am
A TTAB judge once said to me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case about 95 percent of the time just by looking at the marks and the involved goods and/or services. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
…the stone is not permitted under the Regulations and no good reason has been advanced for allowing an exception. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 am
and by offering counterfeit goods in Pixels’ store: Canvasfish presents a plausible case that the goods Pixels sold bearing the DEYOUNG mark were counterfeits. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am
The plaintiff’s trade marks were used identically in the course of trade for identical goods, resulting in the finding of trade mark infringement. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 1:04 pm
" Hughes, 506 Mich at 539 (quotation marks and citation omitted). [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 3:06 am
Critics also cite the Bush v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 4:17 pm
In Kejriwal v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm
Others have looked at the holding itself, but I thought it would be a good opportunity to look at the issue of accessible kiosks generally to see how this case fits with earlier decisions and ask whether it marks a significant change in the law. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:53 am
Marks v. [read post]
