Search for: "Marks v. Goodding" Results 81 - 100 of 12,085
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
We think of TMs as informational vessels that allow consumers to make decisions for themselves based on what they’ve learned either personally or through other means about the goods bearing the mark. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Citing both Dogan/Lemley and Dinwoodie/Janis is a good example: those articles don’t say the same thing. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:24 pm by Dennis Crouch
Chestek at 8 (Quoting JEM Broadcasting Co. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:10 pm by Kurt R. Karst
By Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert & Ana Loloei & Allyson B. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 9:12 am by Marcel Pemsel
The fact that a trade mark might be – even primarily – understood as a promotional formula, does not mean that it cannot be perceived as an indication of origin (CJEU, Smart Technologies v OHIM, C-311/11 P, at para. 30). [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
"The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interred with their bones; So let it be  . . . [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
’” As for that, the Court continued, such use must serve to “identify and distinguish [the mark user’s] goods . . . and to indicate the source of the goods. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Novak                 The Holmes Devise has had a very good year. [read post]