Search for: "Marks v. Goodding"
Results 81 - 100
of 12,085
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2024, 3:29 am
Monster Energy Company v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm
We think of TMs as informational vessels that allow consumers to make decisions for themselves based on what they’ve learned either personally or through other means about the goods bearing the mark. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Citing both Dogan/Lemley and Dinwoodie/Janis is a good example: those articles don’t say the same thing. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 5:38 am
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on a set of stay applications, consolidated under the caption Ohio v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:06 am
Oregon Grain Growers Brand Distillery Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:24 pm
Chestek at 8 (Quoting JEM Broadcasting Co. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:10 pm
By Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert & Ana Loloei & Allyson B. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
World Champ Tech LLC v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
World Champ Tech LLC v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:41 am
Naterra International, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 9:12 am
The fact that a trade mark might be – even primarily – understood as a promotional formula, does not mean that it cannot be perceived as an indication of origin (CJEU, Smart Technologies v OHIM, C-311/11 P, at para. 30). [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 2:47 am
Halet v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
"The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interred with their bones; So let it be . . . [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
’” As for that, the Court continued, such use must serve to “identify and distinguish [the mark user’s] goods . . . and to indicate the source of the goods. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:19 am
Lashify, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Novak The Holmes Devise has had a very good year. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Gooding, William D. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
., Lochner v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Gooding, William D. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 11:41 pm
” That case, now styled Murthy v. [read post]