Search for: "Marks v. Goodding"
Results 121 - 140
of 12,085
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2018, 6:02 am
(L’Oreal SA v Bellure NV [2010] RPC 1 at [41]). [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:44 pm
” Aycock Engineering, Inc., v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:16 am
§295) to prevent people from deceiving the public into believing their goods were patented. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
This would appear to be a strange result (and goes against eg Case T-152/07 Lange Uren v OHIM). [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 5:05 am
This case ABP Technology Ltd v Voyetra Turtle Beach, Inc. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 1:24 am
".Though it appears both logical and correct in law to conclude that the figurative mark can be registered while the word mark can't, the IPKat wonders what it will mean in practice if the figurative mark appears on goods but no use may be made of the word that appears so prominently within it. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 9:35 pm
Merpel observes that this appeal decision does not concern Article 7(1)(e)(iii), which provides an absolute bar to registration where a mark consists exclusively of a shape which gives substantial value to the goods. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 7:46 pm
linkKylie Minogue v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 6:52 am
In addition, the shapes of the other figurative elements are not similar.In light of the weak distinctive character of the human figures in each of the marks at issue, the GC took the view that those marks would not be visually similar.The Court did however consider the marks conceptually similar to an average degree, since both marks are likely to evoke the notion of goods which are beneficial to health and/or strength.The distinctive character of the… [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 5:30 am
In comparing the goods involved, the Court noted that the Board of Appeal in fact compared the goods at issue with those of the mark applied for in Classes 3 and 21, in the same way as the Opposition Division. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 8:02 am
Luen Fat Metal and Plastic Manufactory Limited v Jacobs & Turner Limited t/a Trespass [2019] EWHC 118.BackgroundThe Claimant owns:a series of 3 UK word marks: FUNTIME, FUN TIME, and FUN-TIME in respect of “Class 28: Games, toys and playthings; electronic games”.an EU trade mark for the word FUNTIME for the same goods in class 28. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:53 am
Good Meat Project v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
Rather, it had to be shown that the public reliedon the mark as indicating the origin of the goods. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 4:33 am
Wrangler Apparel Corp. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 9:49 pm
In Fairmont Resort Properties Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
For example, in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
For example, in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 11:28 pm
Last week, this Kat published a post on the issue of trade mark registrations suffering from a lack of clarity [here] following the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)'s decision in C-371/18 Sky v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 7:47 am
If the third-party marks and opposer’s marks are identical, the opposer’s marks and the applicant’s marks are compared to see if they are identical or non-identical for identical goods or services. [read post]
