Search for: "Marks v. Goodding"
Results 161 - 180
of 12,085
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2010, 1:59 am
B.V. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:46 am
The Board observed that, although the words in a word + design mark like applicant's are usually accorded greater weight, in this case opposer K-C's mark comprises only the image of a puppy with its paw on a roll of toilet paper, "so rather than using words to call for Opposer’s goods, consumers might identify Opposer’s brand another way, perhaps by recalling and mentioning the dog, or 'the puppy with toilet paper.'"… [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 9:22 am
Pequignot v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:23 am
The Red Sox have opposed registration of the mark shown below, for clothing, claiming likelihood of confusion, false association, and failure to use the mark on all the goods. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:56 pm
The applicant relied upon the ‘extended’ form of passing off (referred to in Chocosuisse Union des fabricants suisses de chocolat & Ors v Cadbury Ltd. [1999] EWCA Civ 856), which enables several traders to have rights over a sign which has acquired a reputation on the market (and whereby - as per the UK law of passing off - such notional use by another has constituted a misrepresentation, and damage was caused).The BoA had previously found that, whilst there was reputation… [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 1:45 pm
CA/L/369/2008: The Procter and Gamble Company v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Kantor v Commissioner of Internal Revenue - The issue for decision in this case was whether the taxpayer was entitled under section 475(f) to use the mark-to-market method of accounting in connection with his business as a securities trader. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:45 am
This time the dispute centred on likelihood of confusion.SOULUXE - SoulCycle Inc v Matalan LtdMatalan sought to register the SOULUXE device for various goods and services including clothing in Class 25. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 4:13 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 3:36 am
Hybrid Athletics, LLC v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:26 am
” This Kat has a good idea how to go about proving a negative when non-use is at issue. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 7:27 am
I blogged here about the Advocate General's opinion in Sky v Skykick a while ago, and now the Court of Justice has given its opinion. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 1:20 pm
The Court of Appeal of Malaysia had recently provided its grounds of judgment for an important decision in Y-Teq Auto Parts (M) Sdn Bhd v X1R Global Holdings & Anor (CACA NO. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:02 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) issued its eagerly awaited decision in Masterpiece Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 6:24 pm
Inspiration Software, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 4:53 am
China Healthways Institute, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 4:45 pm
Rogers v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 3:11 am
Barnaby Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 4:25 am
The recent Federal Court of Appeal decision in Geox S.P.A. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 4:25 am
The recent Federal Court of Appeal decision in Geox S.P.A. v. [read post]
