Search for: "Marks v. Howe" Results 1 - 20 of 14,119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2019, 12:08 pm by SCOTUStalk
The post A trademark case with colorful language: Amy Howe and Mark Walsh talk through <em>Iancu v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:31 am
In Community Trade Marks: Specsavers v ASDA 7 Feb 2012 NIPC Law I analysed the litigation that had taken place between two well known retailers in which the Court of Appeal considered how far an aggressive marketing campaign can go without infringing trade mark law. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 11:41 am by Immigration Prof
How A Bond Hearing Saved Me From Deportation By Mark Hwang Today the Supreme Court will hear Jennings v.... [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 4:46 am by Dennis Crouch
The Marking Requirement: Here is how the marking statute has been interpreted. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 10:35 am by Richard M. Re
And the Court has repeatedly declined to clarify how to apply the Marks rule. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am by Peter Groves
How strongly and immediately was the claimant's mark brought to mind by the defendant's sign? [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 7:50 pm
Coach Carroll has put Sanchez off limits to the press, stating, “I know how excited he is. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 2:09 am by war
How it sits with Re Yanx’ TM might be another matter. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 7:44 am by Matt Osenga
Yesterday, the Federal Circuit affirmed the grant of summary judgment of no liability for false marking in Pequignot v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am by Peter Groves
How strongly and immediately was the claimant's mark brought to mind by the defendant's sign? [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:00 am by James Yang
In Pequignot v Solo Cup Company, 2009-1547 (June 10, 2010), the Court focused on the “intent” required for liability under the false marking statute. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 1:00 pm by Carissa Byrne Hessick
Many law professors were watching Hughes because it promised to revisit the rule from Marks v. [read post]