Search for: "Marks v. Hudson"
Results 61 - 80
of 295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2019, 4:30 am
In Cohen v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 3:45 pm
This decision by Arnold J is another black mark on the checked fortunes of combination patents before the Patents Court for England and Wales. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:04 am
The four-part test for determining inherent distinctiveness of trade dress was set forth in Seabrook v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:15 am
’” Time, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
And even if viewed as a regulation of purely commercial speech – and therefore not subject to strict scrutiny – the restriction would at least have to pass muster under the Supreme Court’s test in Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 2:00 pm
[avoid the Central Hudson question of reasonable basis if it’s a general regulation that goes beyond commercial speech] Consider Gallo v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:31 am
MARK WILSON, App. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am
State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:05 am
Hudson, Jr. of the First Amendment Center argues that Justice Thomas’s “latest dissent hits the mark when he identifies that the Court is inconsistent when fielding church-state separation questions. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 7:23 am
In a different case involving Zoominfo, Rebecca Tushnet and Mark Lemley will be filing an amicus brief on this point. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 8:40 am
JACKSON V. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 3:21 pm
Perry v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
One such official was Mark Sokolich, mayor of Fort Lee, a New Jersey borough on the Hudson waterfront straddling all the highways to the massive George Washington Bridge. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 8:10 pm
Co. v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:18 am
v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 7:41 am
Having only recently reviewed the logo sponsorship deal in Force India v Etihad (see earlier post here), the IPKat finds himself perusing Hudson Bay Apparel Brands LLC v Umbro International Ltd [2009] EWHC B28 (Ch), a Chancery Division (England and Wales) decision of Deputy Judge Mark Herbert QC, dating back to 4 November 2009.Umbro, an English company [owned by Nike] which enjoyed the fruits of an international licensing business based principally on football… [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
Bans on other commercial speech must survive Central Hudson. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
an essay inspired by Entick v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:25 am
In Matal v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 11:04 am
Enrico Bonadio, Protecting Art in the Street (Dokument Press 2020)Jane Ginsburg, Deep Dive: Burrow-Giles Lithographing v. [read post]
