Search for: "Marks v. Hudson" Results 121 - 140 of 297
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2014, 11:08 am by Benjamin Bissell
Today marks the beginning of oral arguments in the landmark Zivotofsky v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:10 pm by Bexis
  We are aware that, at various times, several of the justices have expressed disagreement with the commercial speech analysis of Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am by Eric Goldman
Like the US Supreme Court in Tam and Brunetti, the Federal Circuit in Elster declined to decide whether trademark laws that regulate speech based on its content are subject to “strict scrutiny and the compelling government interest test, or Central Hudson’s intermediate scrutiny and the substantial government interest test. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:30 am by Kelly
Medical Device Technologies, Inc (Gray on Claims) Pair of District Courts grant motions to dismiss for lack of standing in false marking cases: Shizzle Pop, LLC v. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 10:06 am
The Court served the order by post on the flat – again returned marked gone away. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
KG (IPKat) (Class 46) CFI: Frag Comercio Internacional, SL v OHIM, Tinkerbell Modas LTDA – Have you ever seen two less likely allegedly similar marks? [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 3:42 am by INFORRM
The Guardian reports on the ongoing defamation claim between Clive Palmer and Mark McGowan. [read post]