Search for: "Marks v. Marks"
Results 41 - 60
of 34,278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2015, 9:57 am
This week the Federal Circuit clarified the question in its ruling in David Couture v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 7:13 am
Specsavers' Trade Marks Specsavers have registered the following Community trade marks: (1) 1321298 and 3418928 The word mark SPECSAVERS ("the word mark"); (2) [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 2:09 am
At the Opposition hearing, Nestlé argued that post sale use, such as unwrapping the chocolate after sale, could constitute use as a trade mark citing Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment v Nuplayer Ltd [2005] EWCH 1522 (Ch D) in support. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:57 am
Interflora Inc and another v Marks & Spencer plc (Case C-323/09); [2011] WLR (D) 281 “Article 5(1)(a) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC and article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark was to be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a trade mark was entitled to prevent a competitor from advertising on the basis of a keyword which was identical with the trade mark and which had been selected in an… [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 9:56 am
Post-Brexit, evidence of use and acquired distinctiveness of a trade mark may be one of the areas within trade mark law that cause headaches for practitioners. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am
Sky v Skykick [2018] EWHC 155 (Ch) told us that this required the global assessment so beloved of the Court of Justice, taking into account all the circumstances of the case. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 1:32 am
This question arose in the recent Singapore case of FMTM Distribution Limited v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:13 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 2:28 am
Regina v Billingham (Mark) Regina v Billingham (Justin) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “While the present Judicial Studies Board direction in respect of previous inconsistent statements required the jury to be sure that a previous statement exculpatory of a defendant was true, it was sufficient for the jury to conclude that it might be true. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 2:47 am
Janice Luck and Peiwen Chen have published at the Fortnightly Review an analysis of the High Court’s recent rulings in the trade mark cases: Gallo v Lion Nathan (the Barefoot case) and Health World v Shin-Sun. [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:25 pm
”To stop a vehicle for a Marked Lanes violation (or other traffic violation), Delaware v. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 2:31 am
Jane LambertBusiness and Property Courts, Intellectual Property List (Mr Justice Miles) Iconix Luxembourg Holdings SARL v Dream Pairs Europe Inc and another [2023] EWHC 706 (Ch) (28 March 2023)This was a trade mark dispute. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 6:57 am
Jane LambertChancery Division, Intellectual Property List (Mr Ian Karet) Revive A Phone Ltd v WeFix [2022] EWHC 2195 (Ch) (19 Aug 2022)This was an appeal against the decision of the hearing officer, Ms Rosie Le Breton, of 9 Sept 2021 invalidating the word mark WEFIX and the blue and white device mark that appears above. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 4:30 am
Jane LambertChancery Division (Mr Justice Marcus Smith) Lifestyle Equities CV v The Copyrights Group Ltd and others [2021] EWHC 1212 (Ch) (10 May 2021)This was an action for trade mark infringement and passing off, The first claimant was the registered proprietor of the following European Union and United Kingdom trade marks and the second claimant was its exclusive licensee:EU005482484 [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 4:53 pm
Jane LambertIntellectual Property Enterprise Court (HH Judge Hacon) Marks and Spencer Plc v Aldo Stores Ltd. [2023]EWHC 178 (IPEC) 31 Jan 2023This was a claim for the infringement of the following registered designs:6134278 6134280 6134282 6134284, and 6134276.The designs were registered on 29 April 2021 by Marks and Spencer Plc ("M&S"). [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 2:21 pm
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — “Natural life” In 1986, Mark Tibbs, appellant, was convicted by a jury, in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, of first degree murder and related offenses. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 4:17 pm
Other Recent False Marking Cases: O'Neill v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
The Race to the Bottom will be covering the SEC charges against Mark Cuban, the billionaire entrepreneur. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 4:04 am
Jemella Australia Pty Ltd v Bouobeid [2009] FCA 1567 Jemella Australia Pty Ltd v Daizli [2009] FCA 1566 In the Daizli action there is a further complication that the respondents seem to be out of the jurisdiction for some time. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 1:04 am
Austin, Nichols & Co Inc v Lodestar Anstalt [2009] FCA 1228 Lid dip POF [read post]
