Search for: "Marks v. Mobil Oil Corp."
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2008, 2:25 am
The case cite is Exxon Mobile Corp. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:11 am
" AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 3:15 am
Matosantos Commercial Corp., Opposition No. 91218800 [Opposition to registration of the mark shown below left, in view of the registered mark shown below right, both for for "toilet paper," on the grounds of likelihood of confusion under Section 2(d) and false association under Section 2(a)]. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:06 pm
Compare Mobil Oil Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:32 am
Mobil Oil Corp., 7 NY3d 434, 446-47 (2006), quoting People v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 11:05 am
Plaintiffs then cleverly argued that a picture can be equivalent to a word mark, as in Mobil Oil Corp. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:56 am
The Supreme Court pushed-back again on functional claims–perhaps most notably in Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 5:30 am
Canada’s top oil firms, governments grabbed seismic data property http://t.co/5OBItJTue1 -> Google Inc facing heat from Competition Bureau over alleged anti-competitive behaviour http://t.co/c9WVQXeT8S -> Supreme Court decision on damages for wrongful dismissal http://t.co/6947ATpZeR -> Online Copyright Infringement – UK Music http://t.co/H3OLrSlv3d -> Copyright compromise keeps UK internet archive offline http://t.co/FnjdBh4RZ6 -> Game publishers vow to help… [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 4:41 am
The Supreme Court declared in Mobil Oil Corp. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Click Here District Court approves consent decree between feds, Mobil Oil. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 2:08 pm
Mark McKenna: The Implications of Blackhorse v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 5:38 am
Feb. 24, 1999); Mobil Oil Corp. v Filtrol Corp., 501 F.2d 282, 291-92 (9th Cir. 1974) (expressing doubt over the possibility of divided infringement liability).A party cannot avoid infringement, however, simply by contracting out steps of a patented process to another entity. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:31 pm
Mobil Oil Corporation,” 774 So.2d 119, 2000-0947, (La. 12/19/00). [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
Margaret Atwood on creativity (Michael Geist) National Graduate Caucus on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Supreme Court dismisses auto parts resellers' leave to appeal in action seeking expungement of trade marks for non-distinctiveness and abandonment: Hyundai Auto Canada v Cross Canada Auto Body Supply (West) Ltd & Ors (Canadian Trademark Blog) 'Why copyright? [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:51 am
Mark Anderson, Respondents. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
Veoh (Electronic Frontier Foundation) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions No immunity for credit card processors of counterfeit goods: Gucci America, Inc v Frontline Processing Corp et al (IP Whiteboard)] ABA journal reports on decision: Tiffany v. eBay (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Healthy Pets – ‘Appeal’ of UDRP to District Court: NUPRO.COM (Trademark… [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Bayer Corp., 727 F.3d 300 (3d Cir. 2013), and Marcus v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Ars Technica), Google, GE join forces for green tech research, lobbying: (Ars Technica), AIPPI Congress: how to protect you IP rights in virtual worlds (Managing Intellectual Property), Industry still wary of ICANN plan for new top-level internet domains: (Intellectual Property Watch), Ubuntu-Firefox EULA dustup reignites OSS licensing debate: (Ars Technica), Media standard backers attempt Apple-less solo run: (Out-Law), Open Source in Mobile conference: OpenMoko CEO says embrace… [read post]
