Search for: "Marrero, Appeal of"
Results 61 - 80
of 109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
Los Angeles - Later this month, the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit will hear arguments from both sides on high-fashion shoe designer Christian Louboutin's appeal to retain the trademark for red lacquered shoe soles. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 8:42 pm
The question is whether Louboutin’s competitors can make red shoes for consumers who want red shoes because of their aesthetic appeal. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second circuit to review Marerro’s order. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 7:57 pm
A couple of weeks ago the iconic American jewellery and luxury brand retailer filed an amicus curaie brief in support Louboutin's appeal against Judge Marrero's decision (here) dismissing its application for an injunction against Yves Saint Laurent for trade mark infringement of its red-soled shoes. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:28 pm
These iconic heels are now the subject of an appeal to the Second Circuit, after Judge Victor Marrero found enforcement of the Louboutin mark protecting these famous heels was barred by the aesthetic functionality doctrine. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 8:47 am
Tiffany & Co. filed an amicus curiae brief in support of Christian Louboutin’s appeal to reverse Judge Marrero’s decision that questioned the validity of the Louboutin red-sole trademark. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 3:51 pm
The case is on appeal in the Second Circuit, and Tiffany & Co. filed a brief Tuesday in support of Louboutin. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit arguing that Judge Marrero made “errors of law in determining that Louboutin’s red outsole mark was likely invalid. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:57 am
On appeal, the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed Marrero’s conviction for felony criminal mischief, reasoning that “a trial court may conclude that certain repairs are so self-evident that the fact-finder could conclude based on life experience that the statutory damage threshold has been met. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:06 pm
Tell your client to appeal. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:07 am
There will no doubt be more to come and it is likely, under the circumstances, that Louboutin will appeal to the Second Circuit to protect its registered trademark. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:12 am
Tell your client to appeal. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:36 am
Marrero, 148 N.J. 469, 483 (1997). [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 6:36 pm
I am sure Louboutin will appeal the decision to cancel the red outsole trademark if the decision is finalized on August 17, 2011. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:04 am
[Dixon], [Felix] Marrero, and several others entered the lobby seconds later. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:23 pm
” Marrero v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 7:00 am
Marrero v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:57 am
Victor Marrero) - Per Morrison, US based purchasers of Swiss issued shares traded on Swiss Stock Exchange have no cause of action under Section 10(b). [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 12:50 pm
Marrero, 417 U.S. 653, 664 (1974). [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:41 am
The plaintiff, Jeffrey Marrero, served 20 months of a five year robbery sentence, until he was released following reversal on appeal and a decision by prosecutors not to retry the case. [read post]
