Search for: "Marrero v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2011, 7:57 pm
A trade mark registration is prima facie evidence that the mark is registered and valid (Lane Capital Mgmt v Lane Capital Mgmt (1999)). [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
But the United States Supreme Court held in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
A new blog sponsored by Thompson Reuters called On The Case has an interesting post on the ramifications of the Ninth Circuit's CAFA decision handed down last week, Washington v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:42 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and John V. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 1:52 pm
Arturo Marrero, pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Case No. 10-60244-CR-COOKE. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:57 am
In Marrero v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:06 pm
He stated that"Louboutin? [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:07 am
Based upon these observations, the Court held a single color is not protectable in the fashion industry and, in consideration of its findings under federal law, the Court held Louboutin was unlikely to succeed on its state law claims. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:36 am
State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 6:04 pm
— a case about colored outsoles of high-end ladies’ footwear — the Honorable Victor Marrero of the United States District Court for the Southern [...] [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 12:29 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 6:12 pm
(picture, right - the offending Yves Saint Laurent shoe)During a hearing last Thursday, US District Judge Victor Marrero stated that he would decide on whether to grant Louboutin's request for a preliminary injunction "as soon as possible". [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 1:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:04 am
Chase did not respond, but [Dixon] stated,`The dude hit us. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:23 pm
” Marrero v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:11 pm
Readers of this blog may recall that in September 2010, Judge Victor Marrero entered a significant ruling in the case, in which he granted the defendants’ motion, in reliance on the Morrison v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 7:00 am
Marrero v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:57 am
Terra Sec v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 12:50 pm
The new wrinkle in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 1:10 pm
Despite the Supreme Court’s view in United States v. [read post]
