Search for: "Marriage of Long v. Long"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,516
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
I was excited to read this opinion when I saw that an equal division in a long marriage was reversed in favor of a 75%-25% division. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 7:29 am
Even they were surprised that the arrangement had worked so long. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
In 2014, in Burwell v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm
In 1997, in Boerne v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 6:38 am
Leytrick v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Many, but not all, families are the product of a marriage. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 1:07 pm
In Anderson v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 8:27 am
"The new rule was issued in a declaration by the church’s office on doctrine and introduced by its prefect, Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández, who said that the declaration did not amend 'the traditional doctrine of the church about marriage,' because it allowed no liturgical rite that could be confused with the sacrament of marriage. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:04 am
Marital v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
In Anderson v Anderson, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2023 WL 8246131, 2023 N.Y. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 2:35 am
Amongst other things, employers are not allowed to include pregnancy testing in the employee’s onboarding medical examination, and are also prohibited from placing any restriction on marriage or childbirth or the candidate’s marriage or childbirth status as a pre-condition for hiring female employees. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm
Kastenberg, Goldwater v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Consider the 2001 SCOTUS case of PGA Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm
As usual in public venues, there were insufficient facilities for women (a bit ironic, considering the subject of the conference), and a long line. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:24 am
Most notably, O'Connor wrote the Court's majority opinion in New York v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 9:49 am
Days after I wrote about the Guardian Ad Litem (GAL) role for litigants here in the R.B. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 12:04 pm
"It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on October 26, 2023, be modified as follows:On page 11, in lines 5 and 6 of footnote 4, delete the phrase “Tak Chun distastefully implies” and replace it with the phrase “Tak Chun’s comparison could be read to distastefully imply” so the full footnote reads as follows:Tak Chun’s comparison to our Supreme Court’s decision in In re Marriage Cases (2008) 43 Cal.4th 757 is ill conceived, for this… [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 5:17 am
Court battles can be long and expensive, so it’s wise to try and minimise the risk of your divorce ending up in court if your marriage ends. [read post]
