Search for: "Marriage of Thomas"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,745
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
The marriage of legal proficiency and operational excellence creates a firm that’s agile, client-centric, and poised for continuous growth. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am
Article 8 ECHR and legal recognition for same-sex relationships: Koilova In Koilova and Babulkova v Bulgaria [2023] ECHR 40209/20 [in French], Ms Koilova and Ms Babulkova had married in England, but the national authorities had refused to record Ms Koilova’s marital status as established by her UK marriage certificate as “married” on her birth record. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:48 am
This reflected the popularity of eugenics among progressives nationally, as catalogued by Princeton University Professor Thomas C. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm
Canon lawyer Thomas Schüller described the verdict as a “watershed in German judicial history”. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:08 am
This likely played a role in Baumgartner’s decision to end the parties’ marriage. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
The criticism stems from expensive trips taken years ago by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito Jr. underwritten by wealthy business executives and not disclosed in required annual financial reports. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
Gorsuch J for the Court (Roberts CJ, and Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh and Barrett JJ concurring) held that the First Amendment prohibits Colorado from forcing the appellant, a designer who intended to produce customized and tailored wedding websites, to create expressive designs conveying messages with which she disagrees, such as for for same-sex marriage. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
"It's perfectly clear that nobody in 1868 thought that the 14th Amendment was going to protect the right to same-sex marriage," he says. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
Former MP George Osborne has called in police after a “malicious” email was sent out to wedding guests days before his marriage to Thea Rogers. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Reasonable observers can understand that the Company might express negative views about such marriages while complying with its legal obligation to serve such customers. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 10:33 pm
(Sorry, Justice Thomas). [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Because designing a website involves “expression,” she said, the application of the law to her would amount to forcing her to express a message—approval of same-sex marriage—with which she disagrees.Did Smith really have concrete plans to start a wedding website design business? [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:24 am
ShareThe court handed a major victory to business owners who oppose same-sex marriage for religious reasons on Friday. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:20 am
Here’s the Friday morning read: The Supreme Court Overturns Fifty Years of Precedent on Affirmative Action (Jeannie Suk Gersen, The New Yorker) The Mysterious Case of the Fake Gay Marriage Website, the Real Straight Man, and the Supreme Court (Melissa Gira Grant, The New Republic) With Supreme Court Decision, College Admissions Could Become More Subjective (Anemona Hartocollis, The New York Times) What the Supreme Court’s ruling on affirmative action does and does not do (Piper… [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
As a practical matter, Justice Thomas is. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm
She quoted two clerks from that term, Cristina Rodriguez (O'Connor) and Adam Mortara (Thomas). [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
This bibliography comprises scholarly books, book chapters, and journal articles published or accepted for publication by full-time, emeritus, and retired faculty of the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law between April 1, 2023 and June 30, 2023. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
That suggestion was found in the far more hot-headed draft of the Kentucky Resolution prepared secretly by then-Vice President Thomas Jefferson. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:14 am
The court’s majority opinion addressed abortion rights, but Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurring opinion theorized that the notion of “substantive due process” is “demonstrably erroneous. [read post]
28 May 2023, 4:46 pm
” In re Marriage of Thomas, 608 NE 2d 585 – Ill: Appellate Court, 3rd Dist. 1993 “Distribution of a business interest can present difficulties, and the court should be mindful that divorcing parties might be unable to work together in a continued business association. [read post]
