Search for: "Marsh v. Deems" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2011, 8:31 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
  A company’s provision of stock options to employees was deemed satisfactory consideration for a non-compete agreement in Marsh USA Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 3:39 am
In Axa Corporate Solutions SA v National Westminster Bank Plc & Marsh Ltd [2010] EWHC 1915 (Comm) Axa sought a declaration by the Court that a terrorism exclusion clause had been incorporated into its renewal of a public and products liability (PPL) policy with RBS, of which NatWest is a group company. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 7:37 am by Steven Smith
  Is official prayer sui generis and thus outside the scope of standard doctrines, as the decision approving legislative prayer in Marsh v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:32 am by Joy Waltemath
Ruling that an employer could be vicariously liable on a tort claim by an individual who was injured in a vehicular collision with an employee after hours, a California appeals court found the “required vehicle” exception to the going and coming rule applicable (Moradi v Marsh USA, Inc, CalCtApp, September 17, 2013). [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:34 pm by Eugene Volokh
Adams, 345 U.S. 461, 468–70 (1953) (elections); Marsh v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 6:53 am
Batson offered candid insight into his handling of Zubulake v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 5:01 am by Terry Hart
” 4Fox News Network v TVEyes, 43 F.Supp. 3d 379 (SDNY 2014). [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 10:52 am by Ben Sperry
The paradigmatic example is a company town, as in the case of Marsh v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 9:24 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Plaintiffs -- two residents who objected to the Christian prayer --testified that they were unaware of any non-Christian houses of worship in the Town of nearly 100,000 residents.The Second Circuit (Calabresi, Wesley and Lynch) notes that the Supreme Court in Marsh v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 7:43 am by Josh Blackman
 Felton, (1985); when we wish to uphold a practice it forbids, we ignore it entirely, see Marsh v. [read post]