Search for: "Marshak v Migliore" Results 1 - 1 of 1
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2010, 2:06 pm
Since the plaintiff failed to establish its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, we need not consider the sufficiency of the defendant's papers in opposition to the motion (see Moore v Stasi, 62 AD3d 764; Marshak v Migliore, 60 AD3d 647). [read post]