Search for: "Marshall v. Cox et al"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
New York: Marshall Cavendish Benchmark, 2008. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:49 pm
Gallagher et al. focused on the best available studies, but some of these studies had significant threats to validity. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
In fact, evidence-based treatment and social policy is the most ethical approach and should be a goal for all practitioners and lawmakers (Douglas, Cox, & Webster, 1999; Grove & Meehl, 1996).Because public perception can influence policy development (Sample & Kadleck, 2006; Zgoba, 2004), it is important to gain an understanding of the degree to which community members demonstrate valid knowledge about sex offenders. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
” See: Gomes v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
Social Security And Taxes Many senior citizens preparing for retirement may not realize that their Social Security income could be taxable under certain conditions. [read post]
