Search for: "Marshall v. Marshall" Results 61 - 80 of 6,270
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  (Infodocket) ICYMI, Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
”  South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 12:53 am by David Pocklington
“The Earl Marshal’s warrant is plainly directed at the question of flying a flag from the roof or tower of a church[***]. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Both sets of arguments rely on a formalistic conception of separation of powers.Overrule Chevron, conservative Justices and advocates say, because Article III gives "the judicial power" to courts; judicial power is, as Chief Justice Marshall said for the Court in Marbury v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 2:44 pm by lennyesq
EDITED BY ANDREW COHEN  Federal officials say Border Patrol troops were blocked by state police from helping a group of migrants, including a woman and two children WHO LATER DIEDon Friday near Eagle Pass, Texas. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 6:40 pm by Mark Tushnet
It too would be determined in each state by the state's own processes, subject perhaps to the possibility, flagged in the literature on Powell v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Shea Denning
In December, the Court granted review in Fischer v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm by Josh Blackman
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
The greatest test for Roberts may not be simply to marshal a majority to overturn this ruling. [read post]