Search for: "Marshall v. Murphy" Results 1 - 20 of 81
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Audit firms are private businesses with the same legitimate interest in making a profit that all private businesses have.[1] But audit firms have also been entrusted to be essential gatekeepers in maintaining the integrity of our capital markets. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Marshall alleged Albritton and two other members of the board breached their duties by engaging in “self-dealing” or by failing to prevent it. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
That three-Justice opinion (written by Justice Brennan and joined by Justices Marshall and Stevens) stressed that the tax exemption was not a permissible accommodation of religion, because it "burdens nonbeneficiaries markedly"[14] "by increasing their tax bills by whatever amount is needed to offset the benefit bestowed on subscribers to religious publications. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Servs., Inc., 188 AD3d 624, 626 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Murphy v Kuhn, 90 NY2d 266, 270; MAAD Constr., Inc. v Cavallino Risk Mgt., Inc., 178 AD3d 816, 818). [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
Here, the Court's newest member is trying to find some middle ground to avoid fissures: JUSTICE THOMAS's thoughtful approach to severability as outlined in Murphy v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 7:15 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
" Id. at 1486 (quoting Walsh, supra, at 777); see Walsh, supra, at 757 (noting that Chief Justice Marshall in Marbury v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”Professor Dorf acknowledged that the so-called anti-commandeering doctrine (affirmed as recently as 2018 in Murphy v. [read post]