Search for: "Marshall v. Payne" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2008, 3:10 pm
The Court of Appeal was presented with the opportunity to follow its own 1958 decision of Payne v Cooper rather than the recent string of cases, (Burrows, Marshall, Aston, Ansell). [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 2:39 pm by Michael C. Smith
Okay, I missed one - the week of June 4 Judge Payne had another patent trial - Cardsoft v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 1:50 pm
After Marshall v Bradford MC, it is vital for a .s85 application to revive tenancy by varying the possession order that the original possession order remain enforceable, particularly since the failure of the Payne approach in Porter v Shepherds Bush. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
[para 94] Lord Neuberger overturns this, based on Payne v Cooper [1958] 1 QB 174, which was not before the Court in Marshall. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 1:28 pm
Payne v Cooper [1958] 1 QB 74 was a Court of Appeal decision. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:15 pm
 Exhibit A is the Court's 1991 decision in Payne v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:22 pm
Based on our searches of various databases, the last time this happened (and the only time in recent history) was 1991 in a case called Payne v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:56 am by Richard M. Re
Breyer’s warning echoed Justice Thurgood Marshall’s 1991 dissent in Payne v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Although both lines ultimately trace back to Brandeis’ Coronado Oil dissent, this part demonstrates how the contemporary conflict effectively emerged out of a key debate between Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justice Thurgood Marshall in 1991’s Payne v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 11:10 am
”Christopher Rootham, a partner at Nelligan O’Brien Payne LLP in Ottawa, who represented the RCMP officers in Meredith, says the ruling is significant in that it creates a perception that wage-restraint legislation is constitutionally permissible in certain circumstances. [read post]