Search for: "Marshall v. Peter" Results 21 - 40 of 285
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2019, 9:55 pm by Patent Docs
October 7, 2019 - Post-argument discussion on the Peter v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Indeed, it is this relationship which gives rise to the duty imposed upon the doctor to properly treat his or her patient (see Bazakos v Lewis, 12 NY3d 631, 634; Payette v Rockefeller Univ., 220 AD2d 69, 72; Ellis v Peter, 211 AD2d 353; Heller v Peekskill Community Hosp., 198 AD2d 265; LoDico v Caputi, 129 AD2d 361, 363; see also Speigel v Goldfarb, 66 AD3d 873, 874). [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 5:30 pm
The latest (v. 35 no. 2) issue of the Journal of Supreme Court History has another article on Justice Harlan, albeit one in a very light vein. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:42 pm by brooks
  For example, in the Peters v Kiff decision, he recognized the importance of the right to trial by jury when he held that a white criminal defendant could challenge the exclusion of black jurors. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
On November 19, Peter Conti-Brown, a doctoral candidate in History, presented to LEGS (“Law-Engaged Graduate Students”) on The Institutions of Federal Reserve Independence. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 2:55 pm
The article is a brief look at the history of dissents during the Supreme Court’s history (with, of course, a nod to John Marshall Harlan’s dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 12:27 pm by Josh Blackman
Peters, another, lesser-known decision from Marshall. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 7:16 am
Brandeis and John Marshall Harlan that I found out about during the last 24 hours: Today (June 7) is Homer Plessy Day. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 12:15 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Michael Daws, No. 108,716 (Wyandotte)Direct appeal (petition for review); aggravated burglaryLydia Krebs (brief); Peter Maharry (argue)Insufficient evidence of aggravated burglaryFailure to instruct on lesser-included offenseFailure to grant mistrialState v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 7:56 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Daniel Parker, No. 111,044 (Riley)Direct appeal; First-degree murderLydia Krebs (brief); Peter Maharry (argue)Improper closing argumentState v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 6:51 am by Dan Ernst
Newman’s Hugo Black, Laura Kalman’s Abe Fortas, and Mark V. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 7:20 am by Walter Olson
House of Representatives Related posts “Congressman Seeks to Send Critic to Jail” (0) Wyeth v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 1:08 am
Yeh, well, okay, so I overdid it--an absence of sobriety in the marshalling of railroad receivership statistics. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:02 pm
Brandeis’s dissent seemed to have been upheld in John Marshall Harlan II’s concurring opinion in Katz v. [read post]