Search for: "Martel Change of Use Appeal"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2011, 7:50 am
The issue in Martel v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
Where the trial judge concluded that Martel failed to prove causation, the Court of Appeal concluded that the Department’s conduct was the principal cause of both Martel’s loss of opportunity to negotiate and of Martel’s loss of a reasonable expectation of an award under the tender process. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
Where the trial judge concluded that Martel failed to prove causation, the Court of Appeal concluded that the Department’s conduct was the principal cause of both Martel’s loss of opportunity to negotiate and of Martel’s loss of a reasonable expectation of an award under the tender process. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:10 am
On Tuesday, December 6, the Court heard argument in a case – Martel v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 4:00 pm
(as he then was), citing Martell v. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 7:16 am
Charlie Martel argued Congress should investigate the Trump administration’s coronavirus response. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 10:57 am
The Court of Appeal also noted that, in view of Martel Building Ltd v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 2:58 am
The only effects of the employer’s opt-out, then, are not to change the fact or source of the employees’ reimbursement for contraception, but instead to further distance the employer (and its money and its plan) from the employees’ use of contraception. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
Like net neutrality, or climate change, or the proliferating parodies of that 10 Hours Walking in NYC video. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:48 am
Brentwood sent a preliminary submission to the Ministry’s project manager to advise them that it had changed its team structure and wished to form a joint venture with EAC. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:48 am
Brentwood sent a preliminary submission to the Ministry’s project manager to advise them that it had changed its team structure and wished to form a joint venture with EAC. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
Hurles is back to provide us with one easy joke every week. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
He credits them (specifically, Michael McConnell) with having changed his mind about a number of important legal issues, in particular, the constitutionality of vouchers (used for religious school tuition), which he came to regard as not unconstitutional or as nonjusticiable—that is, an issue for the legislatures, not the courts, to decide. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:49 am
The Alberta Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed the appeal, agreeing that Sureway’s bid was compliant on its face and that the City had no obligation to investigate suspicions of non-compliance. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:49 am
The Alberta Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed the appeal, agreeing that Sureway’s bid was compliant on its face and that the City had no obligation to investigate suspicions of non-compliance. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
Last Week in the Courts Judgement was given in the appeal of A v Burke and Hare UKEATS/0020/20/DT. [read post]
