Search for: "Martin by and Through Martin v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 877
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2010, 5:46 pm by Dwight Sullivan
The United States’ opposition to the motion for preliminary injunction in Martin v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 7:20 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Lockheed Martin, an appeal from the United States Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit, from around 1950 through 1970, decedent worked as an aviation mechanic for the United States Air Force. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:18 pm by Wells Bennett
Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins released a statement following the completion of yesterday’s hearing in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am by Candace Cathey
handle=hein.journals/usflr29&collection=journals&id=661 "Martin Luther King, Walker v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 In addition to being strong and thoughtful statements of United States policy, these two speeches provide the framework within which my observations here can be better understood. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:25 am by Benjamin Wittes
,”—and calling for “destruction of the United States,” and “the destruction of the Jewish people. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:50 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Brigadier General Mark Martins’s statement regarding this week’s hearings in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 12:41 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  Yesterday, the United States’ lawyers filed this motion to file a surreply, making this explosive allegation:  ”4. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 My team is the United States armed forces. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am by Terry Hart
” In honor of Martin Luther King, Jr. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 7:45 am by Brad Kuhn
 The Court explained that the United States Supreme Court is divided on whether a judicial action may constitute a taking. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 7:45 am by Brad Kuhn
 The Court explained that the United States Supreme Court is divided on whether a judicial action may constitute a taking. [read post]