Search for: "Martin v. Chambers"
Results 21 - 40
of 269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2007, 9:48 am
Martin O'Malley (D). [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 11:17 am
“It’s like owning a gas chamber,” he said, though it really isn’t. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 12:20 am
The judge in Rakusen, Deputy President of the Lands Chamber Martin Rodger QC, rejected the landlord’s argument that the repayment of rent could only be required from the landlord who was the direct recipient of rent from the tenant making the application [30]: “As a matter of language there is nothing incongruous in referring to a sum being “repaid” by a person who was not the original payee. [read post]
16 May 2012, 6:54 pm
See Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:36 am
Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins issued the following statement on Saturday, February 13th: CHIEF PROSECUTOR MARK MARTINS REMARKS AT GUANTANAMO BAY 13 FEBRUARY 2016 Good evening. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:19 pm
A summary of the facts The case of Macatė v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
In the case of Moran v Schwartz Publishing [2015] WASC 215 Kenneth Martin J struck out two paragraphs of the defence including prior publications relied on in mitigation of damage. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 11:04 pm
The big news in international trade is yesterday's judgment in Microsoft v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 3:25 pm
Contents include: Kai Ambos, European Criminal Law and Brexit David Baragwanath, Energising the Law’s Response to Terrorism: The Decision of the Appeals Chamber of the Special Tribunal of Lebanon and the Need for Further Action Martin Böse, The Transnational Dimension of the ne bis in idem Principle and the Notion of res iudicata in the European Union Michael Bohlander, “The Global Panopticon”: Mass Surveillance and Data Privacy Intrusion as a Crime… [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 11:46 am
The UT gave judgment on 20th March 2020 (Martin Rodger QC, Deputy Chamber President, and Peter D McCrea FRICS). [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 9:52 am
David Boyer, Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of Jerry Lee Chambers v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:32 pm
Well, we all missed a Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) decision -- quite a big one and an unusual one too -- Case C‑661/11, Martin Y Paz Diffusion SA v David Depuydt, Fabriek van Maroquinerie Gauquie NV, a ruling of the Third Chamber of Europe's favourite court that dates all the way back to 19 September. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 12:38 am
Martin Davie, Reflections of an Anglican Theologian: Would a Provincial solution require Parliamentary approval? [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 3:18 am
A very interesting article in the New Law Journal (NLJ) from Laura West, barrister, Arden Chambers and Marianne Rivett, solicitor, Kennedys (currently available here) highlights some of the injustices and inconsistencies in the current tenancy deposit protection scheme (TDPS) legislation.The article considers a case heard in May 2009 in the Central London County Court, Jacklin v Fraser Property Management Ltd, T/a Martin and Co (Bedford). [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 10:48 am
The Claimant was represented by Eleri Griffiths and Martin Hodgson of One Pump Court Chambers, instructed by Radhika Shah, Solicitor, Harrow Law Centre. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 4:02 am
This morning the CJEU (second chamber) handed down judgement in case C-98/13, Martin Blomqvist v Rolex SA,Manufacture des Montres Rolex SAThe point at issue before the CJEU (set out in a series of questions which the court condensed to a single answer) was that, in the scenario where somebody purchased from a non-EU website counterfeit goods (in this case, a fake Rolex), could these be seized by customs, it being apparently common ground… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 1:43 pm
But as a courtesy to O'Malley, Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 12:11 pm
Martin Chakraborty, is very hard to beat. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 12:20 am
The judge in Rakusen, Deputy President of the Lands Chamber Martin Rodger QC, rejected the landlord’s argument that the repayment of rent could only be required from the landlord who was the direct recipient of rent from the tenant making the application [30]: “As a matter of language there is nothing incongruous in referring to a sum being “repaid” by a person who was not the original payee. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 4:41 am
The question comes to mind as I watch the growing awareness and discussion surrounding the January 2013 decision of R. v. [read post]
