Search for: "Martin v. Heard" Results 1 - 20 of 733
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2019, 8:20 pm by Jeff Welty
Many readers will by now have heard the news: Chief Justice Martin is stepping down to become the Dean of the Regent School of Law, a Christian law school in Virginia. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 3:48 pm by Barry Barnett
Blawgletter didn't follow the Trayvon Martin case -- State of Florida v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm by Human Rights at Home Blog
by Jena Martin, Professor, West Virginia University College of Law, guest contributor On Wednesday October 11th, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Jesner v. [read post]
25 May 2013, 2:14 am
Impeachment Evidence First, we know Witness 8 will likely testify about Trayvon Martin’s statements to her and we know audio experts will likely testify that Trayvon Martin can be heard on the 911 calls. [read post]
25 May 2013, 2:14 am
Impeachment Evidence First, we know Witness 8 will likely testify about Trayvon Martin’s statements to her and we know audio experts will likely testify that Trayvon Martin can be heard on the 911 calls. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:37 pm by Kent Scheidegger
How much of a change is the Martin decision, really? [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 4:29 pm
The case of Sugar v BBC & Anor (on appeal from [2010] EWCA Civ 715), which was due to be heard on the 9th and 10th February, has been withdrawn from the list of hearings and relisted for November. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:59 am
Jane Lambert Martin Howe QC Ahmet Erol v Sumaira Javaid BL O/253/17 12 June 2017 The Registered Designs Act 1949 was passed the same year as the Patents Act 1949. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 I commend them to you if you’ve not already heard or read them. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Oliver Douglas’ action against Terence McLernon was the first of the four proceedings heard by His Honour with the evidence in the first matter standing as evidence in each of the proceedings. [read post]