Search for: "Martin v. Johnson" Results 61 - 80 of 473
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by INFORRM
Chad Flanders “Flag Bruen-ingTexas v Johnson in Light of The Supreme Court’s 2021-22 Term” 2022 University of Illinois Law Review Online 94 considers whether the Supreme Court’s First Amendment protections for flag burning as a form of political process could survive Bruen, and fears that they may not. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 10:53 am by Howard Friedman
The remainder of the case was dismissed.In Johnson v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 11:30 am by Karen Tani
From Rosa Parks’s courageous defiance, to Martin Luther King’s resounding cadences in “I Have a Dream,” to Lyndon Johnson’s leadership of Congress, to the Supreme Court’s decisions redefining the meaning of equality, the movement to end racial discrimination decisively changed our understanding of the Constitution. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  Judge Johnson wrote the lower court opinion in Hardwick v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:44 am by Eugene Volokh
” At that point, the defendant and Johnson talked about what to do, and Johnson gave the defendant a knife. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 7:58 am by Eric Goldman
Google Twitter Isn’t a Shopping Mall for First Amendment Purposes (Duh)–Johnson v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 11:14 am
(Haywood) Johnson, 239 Fed.Appx. 986 (6th Cir. 9/4/07), 2007 WL 2492405 (unpublished) (reversing downward variance as substantively unreasonable). [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:02 pm by Dave
In John Romans Park Homes Ltd v Hancock [2018] UKUT 249 (LC), Martin Rodger QC, Deputy President of the Upper Tribunal, made an interesting, tricky, but important distinction concerning the criteria for when a park provides security for a mobile home. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 5:21 am by Jack Bogdanski
"Ed Johnson, the long-time Oregon Law Center lawyer in the Portland case, was also the plaintiffs’ lawyer in the recent Grants Pass case that extended the rule adopted by the Ninth Circuit in the notorious decision Martin v. [read post]