Search for: "Martin v. Marks"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am
Martin v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 1:55 am
AmeriKat Annsley refers to the report written by Martin O’Connor (Addisons) on the recent case of Upaid Systems Ltd v Telstra Corporation Limited (No 4) [2016] FCA 1514 where the Federal Court of Australia recently grappled with the issue. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 8:20 pm
Warshak v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 10:57 am
Then, when Timbercom submitted the two bids to Lockheed Martin, it marked up Os’s bid by 72% but only marked up the competitor’s bid by 42%. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
"[T]he possibility that a judgment rendered without the omitted party could have an adverse practical effect on that party is enough to indicate joinder" (Matter of Nemeth v K-Tooling, 163 AD3d 1143, 1144 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of 27th St. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
"[T]he possibility that a judgment rendered without the omitted party could have an adverse practical effect on that party is enough to indicate joinder" (Matter of Nemeth v K-Tooling, 163 AD3d 1143, 1144 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of 27th St. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:30 pm
Jack Balkin, Erwin Chemerinsky, Mark Lemley, Martin Redish, Steven Shiffrin, Geoffrey Stone, Rebecca Tushnet and many more. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 5:25 am
See Geier v. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 12:41 am
A dispute between the firm of Pizzeys Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys – owned by listed entity IPH Limited (ASX:IPH) – and a firm established by two former Pizzeys principals, has gained public exposure through a decision of Justice Jagot in the Federal Court of Australia: Pizzeys Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys Pty Limited v Bennett [2019] FCA 2084. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Ricotta & Marks, P.C., Long Island City, NY (Thomas A. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Ricotta & Marks, P.C., Long Island City, NY (Thomas A. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:29 am
The law of the case doctrine ”is a rule of practice, an articulation of sound policy that, when an issue is once judicially determined, that should be the end of the matter as far as Judges and courts of co-ordinate jurisdiction are concerned” (Martin v City of Cohoes, 37·NY2d 162, 165 [1975]). [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
This requirement protects the right to due process by providing such a person the opportunity to be heard before his or her interests are adversely affected (see Matter of Martin v Ronan, 47 NY2d 486, 490 [1979]; Mahinda v Board of Collective Bargaining, 91 AD3d 564, 565 [2012]; Matter of 27th St. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
This requirement protects the right to due process by providing such a person the opportunity to be heard before his or her interests are adversely affected (see Matter of Martin v Ronan, 47 NY2d 486, 490 [1979]; Mahinda v Board of Collective Bargaining, 91 AD3d 564, 565 [2012]; Matter of 27th St. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 7:30 pm
McKeon and Martin Schoenfeld. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm
Mining billionaire Clive Palmer has declared he is confident he will win his defamation case against WA Premier Mark McGowan, revealing he plans to give evidence at the trial. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 10:23 am
The Sixth Circuit recently made headlines with its trade dress decision with its decision in Makers Mark v. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 6:05 am
The three-step Coco v AN Clark test was applied to the dispute. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:28 am
Mark McAdams and R. [read post]
