Search for: "Martin v. Marks" Results 161 - 180 of 1,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2011, 6:46 am by Paul Horwitz
Mark's post below about the Parents Involved case and the argument over the meaning of Brown v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Michael Martin, Should the Government Be In the Business of Taxing Churches, 29 Regent University Law Review 309 (2017). [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 3:01 am
Anne Marie Brennan, Historical Reflections on the Criminalisation of Terrorism under International Law from the League of Nations to R v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 10:14 am by Sophie Corke
This Kat is trying to avoid copyright liabilityWelcome to this week's roundup of recent stories and commentary from around the IP blogosphere.PatentsGermany's Federal Court of Justice handed down a potentially extremely significant judgment for SEP/FRAND in Europe, in the case of SISVEL v Haier. [read post]
22 May 2013, 8:24 am by Sheldon Toplitt
 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)Social media behemoth Facebook and an Oregon ad agency have been sued for copyright infringement [17 U.S.C. sec. 101 et seq.] in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan by the company that licenses and manages the music of 40-year-old rapper/songwriter Eminem (Marshall Bruce Mathers III).In the Complaint filed May 20, Eight Mile Style, LLC & Martin Affiliated LLC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 1:11 am
Thomas Lubanga Dyilo Views on Investment and Trade LawBregt Natens & Jan Wouters, The State of Play and Future of Services Negotiations in the WTO Annelies Vrbova, Markéta Nováková, & Martin Bulánek, The Czech Republic in the WCIT-12 Vojtěch Trapl, Thinking Big - Bifurcation of Arbitration Proceedings - to Bifurcate or not to Bifurcate [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 7:23 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Trial Length and Outcomes in Patent Cases, by Mark A. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 11:41 pm by Mark Summerfield
  In the past year or so there have been four appeals filed with the Federal Court of Australia against Patent Office decisions refusing applications for computer-implemented inventions: Todd Martin v The Commissioner of Patents, QUD374/2017; Rokt Pte Limited v The Commissioner of Patents, NSD1292/2017; Repipe Pty Ltd v The Commissioner of Patents, WAD323/2018; and Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v The Commissioner of Patents, NSD1343/2018. [read post]
Writing separately, Circuit Judge Rawlinson said she would have affirmed the district court’s decision (OTR Wheel Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]
More from our authors: The Copyright/Trademark Interface: How the Expansion of Trademark Protection Is Stifling Cultural Creativity by Martin Senftleben€ 148 Special Protection of Trade Marks with a Reputation under European Union Law by Michal Bohaczewski€ 136 [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 5:51 am by Steve Shiffrin
Despite the Court's infamous decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
 Complete the look: Ralph Lauren Polo sweaterKat friend Just Wang analyses another Singaporean opposition trade mark case, in which passing off was relied on as the single (and successful) ground of opposition: When passing off is enough to successfully oppose a trade mark.In the conclusion of another trade mark battle, Mr Justice Arnold has handed down his decision in Sky v Skykick [2018] EWHC 155: BREAKING: Sky's the limit for CJEU references in Sky v… [read post]