Search for: "Martin v. PMA GROUP"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2013, 11:37 am
The product at issue is a premarket approved (“PMA”) medical device and therefore plaintiff’s claims are preempted under Riegel v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
” Martin v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:18 am
Supreme Court case Atkins v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 7:02 am
(PMA of North Carolina), allegedly provided illegal financial incentives to providers who were considering using their services. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
: (Patent Baristas), US: How to avoid a permanent injunction: the lessons of Amgen v Hoffman-LaRoche: (Patent Docs), US: Jarvik Heart’s PTE request based on PMA shell/module submission dates flatlines; ruling on initiation of PTE ‘review period’ mirrors FDA policy for ‘fast track’ products: (FDA Law Blog) Pharma & Biotech - Products Kytril (Granisetron) – Exclusivity ‘parking’… [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm
We’re always open to flattery, and it’s flattering to us when somebody thinks that we provide the best legal research available (at least without a prescription). [read post]
