Search for: "Martin v. Settle" Results 161 - 180 of 604
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Courts have viewed employees who lack licenses as being “unqualified,” in contrast to being “incompetent,” to perform the duties of the position.In contrast, see Matter of Martin ex rel Lekkas, 86 AD2d 712. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 6:45 am by John Jascob
The court also observed that it was rational for the company to settle the disclosure lawsuit. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 2:04 am
Florence Foster Jenkins - the filmLast week, the High Court settled the dispute between script writer Nicholas Martin and opera singer Julia Kogan over the authorship of the script used to produce the film Florence Foster Jenkins (full decision here). [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am by Hanibal Goitom
(Mark Stevenson & Martin Spring, Flexibility from a Supply Chain Perspective: Definition and Review, 27(7) Int’l J. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am by Hanibal Goitom
(Mark Stevenson & Martin Spring, Flexibility from a Supply Chain Perspective: Definition and Review, 27(7) Int’l J. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 7:45 am by jameswilson29@gmail.com
The wife’s argument that the debt did not fit within the ambit of 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(15) because it was owed to a third party and not directly to her former spouse was rejected by the court, citing Howard v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Michel Paradis
Mark Martins, may retire from the position after six long years. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Lockheed Martin Corp., settled for $62 million, earning the firm an eye-opening $22.3 million in fees and expenses. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 12:54 am by Mark Summerfield
The law in Australia regarding patent-eligibility of computer-implemented inventions was supposedly ‘settled’ in May 2016, when the High Court rejected an application for special leave to appeal against a decision of the Full Bench of the Federal Court of Australia, thus leaving Research Affiliates LLC v Commissioner of Patents [2014] FCAFC 150 and Commissioner of Patents v RPL Central Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 177 as – for the moment, at least – the… [read post]