Search for: "Martin v. Social Security Administration"
Results 1 - 20
of 155
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2014, 12:52 pm
On October 20, 2011, I reported in a blog article, “Migraines and Social Security Disability” that the Social Security Administration, in a question and answer type publication in 2009, required a very specific diagnosis from a physician in order that migraines be considered a “medically determinable impairment”. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 12:52 pm
On October 20, 2011, I reported in a blog article, "Migraines and Social Security Disability" that the Social Security Administration, in a question and answer type publication in 2009, required a very specific diagnosis from a physician in order that migraines be considered a “medically determinable impairment”. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
Schmitt, et al. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:23 am
Comm Social Security Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids SOCIAL SECURITY: COOK, Circuit Judge. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:44 am
Retirement Board’s failure to make an independent evaluation of an individual’s application for disability retirement fatal to the processSchlesinger v New York City Employees' Retirement System, 2010 NY Slip Op 20123, Decided on April 7, 2010, Supreme Court, Kings County, Judge Martin SchneierIn this Article 78 action Michael Schlesinger asked the court to annul, the action of the [New York City Employees’ Retirement System] denying his application for a… [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:45 am
A County correction officer [Petitioner] assigned to the core central desk at the county jail, applied for performance of duty disability retirement benefits pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law §607-c. [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:45 am
A County correction officer [Petitioner] assigned to the core central desk at the county jail, applied for performance of duty disability retirement benefits pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law §607-c. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 9:28 am
Doe I and Cargill, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
To remind us that legislators may appeal to their own moral convictions and to claims about social utility to reshape the law as they think it should be in the future. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 10:48 am
Coleman v Harrow LBC, 4 May 2023, Administrative Court, London, David Pittaway KC (unreported) This was a judicial review of Harrow’s failure to secure suitable accommodation under section 193(2) of the Housing Act 1996, another example of Elkundi in action. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:53 pm
(citing, Martin v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 3:44 am
” ODonnell v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 9:35 am
Chahine v Martins: Not so fast… Despite, the decision in Douglas, the more recent case of Chahine v Martins, which was heard on April 14 and decided on April 15, 2020, seems to indicate that a lack of previous court order in regards to parenting will not prohibit parties from dealing with a unilateral elimination of parenting time as a result of COVID-19 on an urgent basis in court. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:31 am
See Karaha Bodas v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:02 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:50 am
In King v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:23 am
International Justice, Wild West v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 1:30 pm
Circuit’s ruling in Doe v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 4:25 pm
If So, It's Time for a Change – from Massachusetts health care and compliance attorney Colin Zick of Foley Hoag on the firm’s Security, Privacy and the Law blog All Eyes on Cheshire Connecticut as Death Pen Trial Begins – from Florida criminal defense attorney Terry Lenamon on his blog, Terry Lenamon on Death Penalty The Study That Never Was - A Lesson in Comparative Advertising – from Reed Smith’s Administrator of Trademark Management… [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm
Social Responsibility on the Internet: Vivi Down Association v. [read post]
