Search for: "Martin v. State Bar"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,004
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 8:22 am
” In Martin v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am
It also prohibits states from maintaining regular armies and navies in time of peace, and absolutely bars them from “engag[ing] in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
But such a disqualified person is not barred from being a state legislator. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Vance, Trump v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:23 pm
In Martin v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:27 am
A key Delaware case followed by the court was Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:41 am
State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 8:29 am
In Doe v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
Hence, ‘[t]he requirement of originality under the [CDPA] is that the work must be an expression of that author's own intellectual creation’ (Banner, para 26).The guidance provided by the CJEU to the determine the sort of creative choices with which copyright is concerned has been regarded as ‘helpful’ by the Court of Appeal (Kogan v Martin, para 45). [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
In Rost v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 5:21 am
"Ed Johnson, the long-time Oregon Law Center lawyer in the Portland case, was also the plaintiffs’ lawyer in the recent Grants Pass case that extended the rule adopted by the Ninth Circuit in the notorious decision Martin v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 3:40 am
Decisions this Week United StatesPennsylvania State Police v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
She was one of the most highly respected and brilliant members of the media law bar and an editor of the leading textbook, Duncan and Neill. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm
City of Philadelphia (Standing to challenge public holiday) Martin v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 2:45 pm
Nick was joined by Christina Martin, a senior attorney with the Pacific Legal Foundation who argued the case to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 9:30 pm
Martin J. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 4:07 am
Yadav v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 10:59 am
For example, in Martin v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The bar is a low one and the background law is favorable to true federal officers but removal is by no means automatic and is often denied. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
Meadows to the State of Georgia’s Response to his Notice of Removal at 1, State of Georgia v. [read post]
