Search for: "Martin v. Taylor" Results 81 - 100 of 206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Hence, ‘[t]he requirement of originality under the [CDPA] is that the work must be an expression of that author's own intellectual creation’ (Banner, para 26).The guidance provided by the CJEU to the determine the sort of creative choices with which copyright is concerned has been regarded as ‘helpful’ by the Court of Appeal (Kogan v Martin, para 45). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
IPSO 18075-23 Singh v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18301-23 Taylor v The Herald on Sunday, 1 Accuracy 2021, Breach – sanction: publication of correction 19677-23 A complainant v The Daily Telegraph, 3 Harassment (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19741-23 Dikme v eveningnews24.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction:… [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:52 am
The arbitrator’s ruling is consistent with the court’s ruling in the Lekkas case [Martin ex rel Lekkas, 86 AD2d 712]. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
David Walliams and Martin Clunes have settled damages claims over phone hacking allegations  by receiving “substantial compensation” and a public apology, after bringing legal action against the publisher of The Mirror, Sunday Mirror and The People. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Jay
App.3d 1032.), a complaint by parents to the principal of a school alleging misconduct by a teacher (Martin v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
It is reported that that on 2 July 2015 in the case of Taylor v NGN Laing J refused the former world darts champion Phil Taylor an injunction to prevent the Sun publishing an interview with his estranged daughters. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 7:15 am by Adam Chandler
Phelps, the funeral picketing case, and Bruesewitz v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm by Howard Knopf
Ariel and I, along with a very smart young law professor named David Lametti, who later became Minister of Justice, made the prevailing arguments in the SCC in the 2015 case of Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:16 am by Erin Miller
 Martin Finucane distills the speech into a few paragraphs at the Boston Globe. [read post]