Search for: "Martin v. Territory" Results 21 - 40 of 227
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2011, 8:39 am by Christine Sellers
The following is a guest post by James Martin, a Collections and Outreach Specialist, in observation of Constitution Day on September 17, 2011. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:37 am
Moreover, Congress can, and for centuries has, passed legislation applicable to unrecognized territories, and called those territories by names not recognized by the Executive. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 10:34 pm by Patricia Salkin
Editor’s Note: This post originally appeared on the RLUIPA Defense Blog and is reprinted with permission: https://www.rluipa-defense.com/2016/08/federal-court-rules-alabama-sex-offender-law-is-land-use-regulation-under-rluipa In Martin v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 12:09 pm by Magdaleen Jooste
  BOOK REVIEW In “Copyright’s Arc”, Martin Skladany describes copyright as a global force, which is nevertheless governed by territorial laws and affected by national or regional dynamics. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 10:47 pm
Though this case, Phillips v Eyre, was mainly concerned with constitutional issues, Willes J laid down a rule for choice of law in tort which endured for nearly a century before it was finally superseded. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:44 am by John Buhl
The TCJA enacted reforms that moved towards a territorial tax system by exempting foreign profits from domestic taxation. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:02 am by Cecile Martin
Cecile Martin A few months after the European Court of Justice ruled on May 13, 2014 that search engines are considered personal data controllers under the EU Data Protection Directive of 1995 and, as such, should provide data subjects with a right to be forgotten, a French Tribunal enforced this principle in X & Y v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:02 am by Cecile Martin
Cecile Martin A few months after the European Court of Justice ruled on May 13, 2014 that search engines are considered personal data controllers under the EU Data Protection Directive of 1995 and, as such, should provide data subjects with a right to be forgotten, a French Tribunal enforced this principle in X & Y v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:30 am by Masahiro Kurosaki
Sari and Nasu’s argument is predicated on the fact that Article V of the treaty does not expressly require a request or advance consultation for the exercise of collective self-defense, and that a related 1960 exchange of notes (also available in English) expressly exempts operations conducted under Article V from requirements for “prior consultation” that otherwise apply to major changes in the presence of U.S. troops, equipment, or facilities in Japanese… [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 11:36 pm by INFORRM
The state and territory borders are irrelevant to the media. [read post]