Search for: "Martin v. United States Board of Parole" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2020, 7:17 pm by Colleen Fitzharris, E.D. Mich.
 (Art Credit: Benton Martin)The first instance was United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am by Marissa Miller
University of Texas at Austin and the arguments in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:34 pm by Jeff Gamso
  I'm talking about the Fish and David Martin and the Jefferson Parish Indigent Defender Board. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Young Moon, appeals from her conviction and sentence entered by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee on April 25, 2006, for three counts of health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am by Melina Padron
Ismailaj v The Parole Board of England & Wales & Anor [2011] EWHC 1020 (Admin) (20 April 2011)  Man imprisoned for human trafficking was not entitled to oral parole board hearing. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 3:39 am
The defendant in State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
Following the outrage, a number of changes have already been made to the parole board system and boards are now obliged to publish the reasoning behind their decisions and grant victims the right to challenge release decisions on violent offenders. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
" Consequently, a state drug offense punishable by more than one year qualifies as a "felony drug offense," even if state law classifies the offense as a misdemeanor. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:16 am by Erin Miller
Briefly: At Concurring Opinions, Robert Schapiro comments on the potential implications that the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm by Law Lady
Ostendorf -- Error to fail to consider whether lesser sanction would be a viable alternativeJANUARY MARTIN, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, Appellant, v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Martin, No. 06-5605 A conviction and sentence for drug- and firearm-related offenses is affirmed primarily where the district court's permitting a police officer to testify as both an expert and a fact witness, without the issuance of a cautionary instruction to the jury, did not constitute reversible error under US v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
" (3)However, some nations such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have at points sought to make methods of execution less liable to bungling or to inflicting gratuitous suffering. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
COLA stated that the matter would be referred to COLA's Contract Fiscal Compliance Unit for a determination. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
State of Tennessee, No. 06-6208 In civil rights suit alleging that city police discriminated against plaintiffs in violation of the Ame [read post]