Search for: "Martinez v. California"
Results 81 - 100
of 505
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2019, 6:17 am
In Smith v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:30 am
The prior employment test came from a case called Martinez v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 6:51 am
In a case that sent shudders through the California employer community, the ABC test adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:45 pm
California Health & Welfare Agency to the Second Circuit’s 10-factor test in Zheng v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 6:12 pm
Mar. 6, 2019) dismissed a claim under California’s Unruh Act that was based on the same facts as the plaintiff’s claim under the ADA. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 11:35 am
According to the initial complaint, Martinez et al v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:13 am
Under US v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 3:19 pm
California appellate courts are beginning to make sense of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 8:06 am
The California Supreme Court case of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 3:05 pm
“Suffer or permit to work” definition of employment In Martinez v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:08 am
Posted by Cydney Posner, Cooley LLP, on Friday, October 12, 2018 Tags: Boards of Directors, Director nominations, Proxy contests, Proxy voting, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting, Universal proxy ballots SEC Sanctions Investment Firm for Inadequate Cybersecurity and Identity Theft Prevention Policies Posted by Sabastian V. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:16 am
Commentary comes from Liz Martinez in an op-ed for The Hill. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 12:43 am
Bement and Martinez v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 6:51 am
Martinez, 543 U.S. 371, 381 (2005), or “fairly possibl[y],” I.N.S. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:22 pm
And reviewed some of the -- get this -- over 250 published opinions in California state and federal court which mention that, yeah, it's definitely a derogatory term. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 2:28 pm
On April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
The outcome in Trump v. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 8:03 am
LEXIS 87398, April 16, 2018), and dismissed without prejudice an inmate's claim of confiscation of his religious material.In Martinez v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:58 pm
On Monday, April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in the matter of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:58 pm
On Monday, April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in the matter of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
