Search for: "Martinez v. California"
Results 101 - 120
of 505
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2018, 3:58 pm
On Monday, April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in the matter of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:02 pm
On Monday, April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in the matter of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:02 am
The Court relisted for a second time in Martinez v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:49 am
In determining that 7-Eleven properly classified the franchisees as independent contractors, the court applied the three-prong test outlined by the California Supreme Court in Martinez v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:38 pm
Martinez v. [read post]
Employees Cannot Obtain “Double Recovery” of Unpaid Wages and Premiums for Non-Compliant Rest Breaks
26 Oct 2020, 3:24 pm
Martinez. [read post]
24 May 2017, 1:49 pm
Broca-Martinez, supra.The opinion then goes on to explain that [i]n United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 11:26 am
Plaintiffs in Sanchez v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:10 am
"Accepting the allegations in plaintiff's complaint as true and resolving all inferences in her favor, as we must in considering a motion to dismiss (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87 [1994]; Benn v Benn, 82 AD3d 548, 548 [2011]), this legal malpractice action accrued in California at the latest in November 2007, when plaintiff received defendants' letter unequivocally informing her that they were no longer representing her or prosecuting… [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 6:06 am
Last Term, in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:51 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm
” (Mendoza, p. 20, Martinez v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:05 pm
Martinez v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:31 am
Martinez v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:30 am
In Coneff v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
In Martinez v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 12:20 pm
The IWC definition of “employee” (as construed in Martinez v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 10:52 pm
” The Issue In agreeing to review the case, the California Supreme Court defined the issue on appeal as whether, in a misclassification case, a class may be certified based on the expansive definition of employee as outlined in the California Wage Order language construed in Martinez v. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 8:25 am
On August 1, 2022, the California Court of Appeals opinion in Martinez v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:03 am
By Ryan McCoy Following the California Supreme Court's recent decision in Martinez v. [read post]
