Search for: "Martinez v. Combs"
Results 21 - 40
of 86
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2017, 1:06 pm
[declining to apply the common law test in light of the history and purposes of the workers‘ compensation statute at issue]; Martinez v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:09 am
Combs, Reynolds v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:03 am
By Ryan McCoy Following the California Supreme Court's recent decision in Martinez v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Bement (2005) 36 Cal.4th 1075, and Martinez v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Recently, the workers filed a supplemental brief under Rule of Court 8.520(d) addressing Martinez v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
In Lee v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 8:00 am
See Martinez v. [read post]
5 May 2018, 5:31 pm
In 2010, in Martinez v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:24 am
Department of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341 or Martinez v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
More importantly, the Court does not discuss the impact of Martinez v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 3:02 pm
Combs, and that all takes a lot of time. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
While the Supreme Court did not accept the workers' further argument, based on Martinez v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:00 am
Combs, 49 Cal.4th 35, 64 (2010)) (emphasis in original). [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 3:19 pm
See Garcia v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 11:09 pm
The only marginally notable result I see is: A non-substantive correction to the opinion in Martinez v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:00 am
Combs, 49 Cal.4th 35, 64 (2010)) (emphasis in original). [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:41 am
The Court next considered whether application of Martinez v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:19 pm
Combs. [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:19 pm
Combs. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Bement (2005) 36 Cal.4th 1075, 1084 (Reynolds), abrogated on other grounds in Martinez v. [read post]
