Search for: "Martinez v. Combs"
Results 61 - 80
of 86
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm
” (Mendoza, p. 20, Martinez v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:14 pm
AndreOn February 7, 2011, in Arechiga v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 10:44 am
At issue in Dynamex was the scope of Martinez v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 6:57 am
Combs. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 2:42 pm
Martinez v. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 3:05 pm
“Suffer or permit to work” definition of employment In Martinez v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:06 am
A 2010 California Supreme Court decision, Martinez v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:49 am
In determining that 7-Eleven properly classified the franchisees as independent contractors, the court applied the three-prong test outlined by the California Supreme Court in Martinez v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 10:10 am
In examining the question of joint employment status, the Ninth Circuit considered the three definitions for employment that the California Supreme Court applied to joint employment claims in Martinez v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 12:20 pm
The IWC definition of “employee” (as construed in Martinez v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:17 pm
Combs (2010), or on the basis of the common law test for employment set forth in S. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 10:52 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 12:43 am
Bement and Martinez v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 10:31 pm
” Martinez v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
GUADALUPE ADRIANA MARTINEZ, BRYAN POWERS, AND LEMUEL LOPEZ; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13-06-00386-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03-08-07)07-0842 VICTOR HADDAD, M.D. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 10:07 am
Martinez! [read post]
20 May 2010, 1:51 pm
DauscherToday, by a unanimous decision in Martinez v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 11:22 am
” Martinez v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:10 am
(See Martinez v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 2:37 pm
(This statute followed Martinez v. [read post]
