Search for: "Martinez v. Housing Authority"
Results 1 - 20
of 123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2007, 9:37 am
In Matter of Romero v Martinez, 280 AD2d 58 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 721 [2001], the First Department found that a NYC Housing Authority resident may have continued occupancy conditioned on the "permanent exclusion" of a dangerous individual, which can include a prohibition on visitation. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 11:12 am
Wells Fargo Martinez v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 9:51 am
The Ninth finds a little light, amongst the gray.United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 4:40 am
Martinez, 2009 U.S. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:35 am
Martinez, 239 F.3d 293, 297 (3d Cir. 2001); Knight v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 6:25 am
Delo and House v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 11:36 am
In Martinez v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:36 am
Notwithstanding the Rucker ruling, in the recent matter of Newark Housing Authority v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 1:46 pm
Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543, 561 (1976); see also Minnesota v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 8:42 am
Delo and House v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
Torres-Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians (Indian Civil Rights Act; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 2:07 pm
LEXIS 31168 (MD PA, March 24, 2011), a Pennsylvania federal district court rejected a Muslim inmate's claims that prison authorities failed to accommodate his Ramadan fast, denied him access to Jum'ah services on one occasion due to the sign-up policy, had an unequal policy on distribution of religious materials and denied Muslim inmates the right to distribute Zakat from their inmate accounts.In Martinez v. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 11:21 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 4:11 am
Furthermore, defendants' interpretation renders the first prohibition superfluous, a result which ‘is to be avoided,’ [citing] Matter of Branford House v Michetti, 81 NY2d 681. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:25 am
Martinez, 983 F.2d 968, 973 (10th Cir. 1992), citing United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
In 2000, the Supreme Court decided Mitchell v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am
Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 (1978) (tribal membership); Parks v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am
Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 (1978) (tribal membership); Parks v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 8:03 am
Mozes v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 6:03 am
Martinez, 221 Ariz. 383, ¶ 14, 212 P.3d 75, 79 (Arizona Court of Appeals 2009) quoting U.S. v. [read post]
