Search for: "Martinez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2015, 6:06 am by Eugene Volokh
In the Supreme Court’s most recent university First Amendment case, Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:58 pm by Amy Howe
ShareIt has been nearly 40 years since the Supreme Court indicated in Chevron v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:07 am by Andrew Hamm
Arteaga-Martinez 19-896Issue: Whether an alien who is detained under 8 U.S.C. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:39 pm by John Elwood
The last new relist from yesterday’s orders is Martinez v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
The indictment charged Peters with making, and causing to be made and presented, false claims to the Internal Revenue Service in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:20 pm
On February 1, a unanimous five-judge panel of the New York State Appellate Division, Fourth Department, which is based in Buffalo, ruled in Martinez v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
Humanitarian Law Project — Court upholds law prohibiting providing services to terrorist group, even when services are of humanitarian nature (in this case, involving providing training in use of international law for peaceful dispute resolution.) [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Berkos, No. 07-2294 Denials of motions to suppress and conviction for failure to pay child support are affirmed where: 1) a magistrate judge may properly issue a search warrant ordering the search and production of electronic evidence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 2703(a), where the warrant is directed to an out-of-state internet service provider; and 2) there was sufficient probable cause supporting a warrant to search defendant's home. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by John Elwood
Wong, 13-1074, filed two actions relating to her detention: a Bivens claim against the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) in federal court, and an administrative FTCA claim. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 1:46 pm by Phil Dixon
Error to deny evidentiary hearing on IAC claim for failure to investigate and present mitigating evidence of brain damage; district court properly denied alleged Brady and Batson violations U.S. v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Mir, No. 05-4985, 05-4989 Convictions for immigration fraud are affirmed over defendant's principal claim that that conversations two witnesses initiated with him at the government's behest violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel because those conversations occurred after defendant had been indicted on the immigration fraud counts. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
Introduction Decisions not to buy or sell goods or services are generally not protected by the First Amendment. [read post]