Search for: "Martinez v. People" Results 201 - 220 of 500
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2015, 6:40 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
This morning, people in coffee houses and churches across the land will no doubt be talking about the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 5:57 am
The 765 Anarchists are going to purge the vile pig scum from this land and restore constitutional rights to the people. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:52 am by SHG
Martinez-Fuerte, explaining why the border expansion is permissible despite the Fourth Amendment (citations omitted). [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am by Maureen Johnston
Cox 14-531Issue: Whether this Court’s decision in Martinez v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
§ 3599(f) to investigate and develop a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel if the claim has been procedurally defaulted, regardless of whether the petitioner can establish cause for the default under Martinez v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) Professor James Stewart, of the Faculty of Law at the University of British Columbia, has produced a valuable on line symposium: Business and Human Rights: Next Steps. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm by Law Lady
HERNANDEZ, PEDRO JOSE MARTINEZ, WILLIAMS ARIELLO GALANTINO, JOSE DE LA CRUZ CARDENAS, on their own behalf and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am by John Elwood
First among them, of course, is marginally faster access to relist information, which is what I assume people mean when they mention “Big Data. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm by Donald Thompson
 This duty of fair dealing encompasses an obligation to ensure fairness in grand jury submissions (People v Pelchat, supra; People v Jordan, 153 AD2d 263 [2nd Dept 1990]; People v Russo, 128 Misc2d 876, 880 [Co Ct Suffolk Co 1985]), which includes notice of the grand jury proceedings that gives a defendant a reasonable opportunity to exercise his right to testify, not mere technical compliance with minimum statutory notice requirements… [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 2:23 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Scheindlin of the Southern District of New York in Martinez-Done v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Indeed, earlier this year, the New York Court of Appeals held in People v Harnett that a guilty plea to a sex offense is not automatically invalidated because the defendant was not warned that he may be subject to SOMTA. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 5:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently issued a decision on this subject in the case of Martinez v. [read post]