Search for: "Martinez v. University of California" Results 41 - 60 of 123
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2012, 10:15 am by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court's ruling Tuesday in the Martinez v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 8:30 am by Benton
 Christian Legal Society Chapter of the University of California v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:53 am by Staci Zaretsky
With the addition of these 12 lawsuits, the grand total of law schools facing class actions over allegedly deceptive employment data is now 15 (let’s not forget about Alaburda v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm by John Elwood
Arizona, 10-9742, for Martinez v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
, (Revenue Law Journal, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 1-36, 2011).James Cleith Phillips, 'All of the Blood and Treasure': The Founders on Christian Legal Society Chapter of the University of California, Hastings College of the Law v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 6:21 am by Amanda Rice
On Monday the Court denied cert. in Martinez v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:11 am by Adam Chandler
Board of Regents of the University of California, a case that challenged California’s policy of charging in-state university tuition rates to illegal immigrants who graduated from California high schools. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 1:21 pm by Maureen Cosgrove
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday denied certiorari [order list, PDF] in Martinez v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 1:21 pm by Maureen Cosgrove
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday denied certiorari [order list, PDF] in Martinez v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 11:52 am by Lyle Denniston
University of California Regents (10-1029). [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:02 am by John Elwood
Regents of the University of California, 10-1029, the preemption case from the California Supreme Court involving resident tuition rates for unlawful aliens, mentioned in last week’s post. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:54 pm by Christa Culver
§ 1623; (2) whether a court must undertake conflict preemption analysis after concluding that an express preemption provision does not apply in a case involving both types of preemption claims.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (California Supreme Court)Petition for certiorariBrief of the Regents of the University of California et al. in oppositionBrief of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges et al. in oppositionPetitioners'… [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:51 am by Lyle Denniston
The Justices were scheduled to consider at their Thursday private Conference the California tuition case (Martinez v. [read post]